RÉFORME ÉLECTORALE - RÉFÉRENDUM 2018
BIG IDEAS:
Grade 5: Canadian institutions and government reflect the challenge of our regional diversity.
Grade 5: Canadian institutions and government reflect the challenge of our regional diversity.
- Participation and representation in Canada's system of governance (electoral boundaries, political parties, electoral process, alternative voting systems, First Peoples governance)
- Learning about the electoral processes (e.g., political parties, voting, representation)
- Comparing the characteristics of the federal government in Canada with those of other countries
Inquiry question: How does our democracy work and can it be improved?
Elections are an integral part of our democracy. Students will compare voting systems: first-past-the-post and proportional representation. By examining these two voting systems, students will be able to make an informed (mock) vote during the referendum.
How exactly does our electoral system work?
|
Comment fonctionne exactement notre système électoral?
|
• A riding is a geographical area represented by an elected representative (also known as an electoral district or constituency). There are currently 338 federal ridings and each is represented by one Member of Parliament.
• British Columbia is divided up into 87 ridings, which are defined geographic areas. Click HERE to see the different ridings in BC. • Canada uses a system called First-Past-The-Post. Voters are allowed to choose one candidate/party on their ballot and the candidate who has the greatest number of votes becomes the elected representative. |
• Une circonscription est une zone géographique représentée par un représentant élu. Il y a actuellement 338 circonscriptions fédérales et chacune est représentée par un député.
• La Colombie-Britannique est divisée en 87 circonscriptions, qui sont des zones géographiques définies. • Le Canada utilise un système appelé "uninominal majoritaire à un tour". Les électeurs votent pour un seul candidat sur leur bulletin de vote et le candidat qui a obtenu le plus grand nombre de votes devient le représentant élu. |
|
|
|
Differences between MAJORITY and MINORITY governments.
WHICH SYSTEM IS BEST?
|
Quel système est le meilleur? |
First Past the Post or Promotional Representation
|
Uninominal majoritaire à un tour ou Représentation proportionnelle
|
In BC's referendum, voters will:
https://elections.bc.ca/referendum/
MEDIA: These two groups have been selected as proponent and opponent groups for BC's referendum.
VOTE PR BC
Proponent Group
|
No BC Proportional Representation Society
Opponent Group
|
Both groups will receive $500, 000 in public funding to support or oppose proportional representation voting systems. This funding is to be used for public info campaigns.
READ the following news articles:
New Zealand gives B.C. a lesson on proportional representation
The cases for and against proportional representation in B.C.
Former B.C. premier warns against change to proportional representation
British Columbians split on proportional representation, one third undecided: poll
Indigenous people would benefit from proportional representation.
New Zealand gives B.C. a lesson on proportional representation
The cases for and against proportional representation in B.C.
Former B.C. premier warns against change to proportional representation
British Columbians split on proportional representation, one third undecided: poll
Indigenous people would benefit from proportional representation.
What is First-Past-The-Post (FPTP)?
First-past-the-post = Winner takes all
• Voting system to elect governments or members of parliament. • Used in Canada. United Kingdom, United States and India. • Voters can only choose 1 candidate on their ballot. • 1 candidate is elected per riding • The candidate with the most votes in their riding wins - Winner takes all. Example: In a riding with 100 ballots cast Julie (Red Party) 32 Jack (Yellow Party) 18 Emma (Bleu Party). 20 Thomas (Green Party). 30 • Here Julie wins even though 60% of the voters chose other candidates. • Under FPTP it is not necessary to win more than 50% fo the votes - a candidate simply needs to win the most votes. • The candidate who gets the most votes from people, wins the race to be elected to a seat in parliament. |
|
Le système uninominal à un tour = le gagnant prend tout
• Système de vote pour élire les gouvernements ou les membres du parlement. • Utilisé au Canada. Royaume-Uni, États-Unis et Inde. • Les électeurs ne peuvent choisir qu'un seul candidat sur leur bulletin de vote. • 1 candidat est élu par circonscription • Le candidat qui obtient le plus de votes dans sa circonscription gagne - Le gagnant remporte tout Exemple: dans une circonscription comptant 100 bulletins de vote Julie (fête rouge) 32 Jack (partie jaune) 18 Emma (Fête Bleu) 20 Thomas (Parti Vert) 30 • Ici Julie gagne même si 60% des électeurs ont choisi d'autres candidats. • Dans le système uninominal majoritaire à un tour, il n'est pas nécessaire de gagner plus de 50% des votes - un candidat doit simplement remporter le plus grand nombre de votes. • Le candidat qui obtient le plus de votes du peuple remporte la course pour être élu à un siège du parlement. |
PROS with First-Past-The-Post:
|
Les avantages avec First-Past-The-Post:
|
CONS with First-Past-The-Post
|
Les désavantages avec First-Past-The-Post
|
Other problems with First-Past-The-Post:
FALSE MAJORITIES:
• In British Columbia, since 1956, 88% of so-called “majority” governments have been “false” majorities. The party won the election but didn’t receive a majority of votes. This is the norm with the FPTP voting system when multiple parties run against each other for a single seat. Other recent examples of this (false majorities) include the Stephen Harper Conservative Federal Government of 2011, the Justin Trudeau Liberal Federal Government of 2015, the Rachel Notley New Democratic Alberta Government of 2015 as well as the Doug Ford Conservative Ontario Government of 2018.
STRATEGIC VOTING:
• Strategic voting is unique to the FPTP voting systems. In every election, rather than voting for the policies they like, large numbers of people vote “strategically” to try and avoid electing their least favourite candidate.
• In British Columbia, since 1956, 88% of so-called “majority” governments have been “false” majorities. The party won the election but didn’t receive a majority of votes. This is the norm with the FPTP voting system when multiple parties run against each other for a single seat. Other recent examples of this (false majorities) include the Stephen Harper Conservative Federal Government of 2011, the Justin Trudeau Liberal Federal Government of 2015, the Rachel Notley New Democratic Alberta Government of 2015 as well as the Doug Ford Conservative Ontario Government of 2018.
STRATEGIC VOTING:
• Strategic voting is unique to the FPTP voting systems. In every election, rather than voting for the policies they like, large numbers of people vote “strategically” to try and avoid electing their least favourite candidate.
|
|
|
What is proportional representation?:
Proportional representation (votes = seats)
• Voting system to elect governments or members of parliament. • Each party gets the number of seats in the parliament according to the number of votes. • # votes = # seats For example: a political party that wins 10% of the vote, will win 10% of the seats in parliament and a party that wins 20% of the vote, will win 20% of the seats. • Every vote is important, as it counts • Proportional Representation reflects voter perferences. • There is more choice in this system. • Other countries that use Proportional Representation: Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. |
|
Représentation proportionnelle (votes = sièges)
• Système de vote pour élire les gouvernements ou les membres du parlement. • Chaque parti obtient le nombre de sièges au parlement en fonction du nombre de voix. • # votes = # sièges Par exemple: un parti politique qui obtient 10% des voix, obtiendra 10% des sièges au parlement et un parti qui obtiendra 20% des voix, remportera 20% des sièges • Chaque vote est important, car il compte • La représentation proportionnelle reflète les perférences des électeurs. • Il y a plus de choix dans ce système. • Autres pays utilisant la représentation proportionnelle: Belgique, Danemark, Finlande, Grèce, Hongrie, Israël, Italie, Luxembourg, Norvège, Russie, Espagne, Suède et Suisse. |
PROS of Proportional Representation:
• It allows different voices to be heard. • It provides a system of true representation. # votes = #seats • It reduces the idea of a wasted vote. • It conforms to what the rest of the world is doing. • It reduces the effects of extremism in politics. • It encourages a coalition government and diversity in opinions to be heard. • It allows for multiple candidate preferences. • Indigenous people would benefit from Proportional representation https://voteprbc.ca/2018/09/indigenous-peoples-would-benefit-from-proportional-representation/ |
CONS of Proportional Representation:
• Can make things easier for extreme parties to gain representation. • It can create political gridlock: Creates a system of government that tends to be indecisive and weak because everyone argues for their own best interests. • It can be an unstable form of government. Having more voices can be a good thing, but it can also create a discord that makes it impossible to government. • It is not always wise to compromise. There are times when a strong majority in the government is required to push through needed reforms. |
https://vittana.org/12-proportional-representation-pros-and-cons
The 3 different Proportional Systems to choose from:
Dual Member Proportional (DMP)
• Two candidates in each riding.
• Voters vote for a pair of candidates (there are two names) • The first seat in a district is won by the candidate with the most votes. (what we have now) • The second seat is won by a party based on its share of the popular vote province-wide and their performance in each district. (proportional part) |
Mixed member proportional (MMP)
• 1 Ballot but 2 votes.
• Electing a mix of local and regional MLAs in each region on the province. • Invented in Germany, also used in New Zealand, Wales and Scotland • Voters elect two types of MLAs: a mix of local (what we have now) and regional (proportional part) |
Rural-Urban Proportional (RUP)
• Multi-member ridings in urban areas and a mix of local and regional MLAs in rural areas.
• Allows for 1 local MLA (what we have now) plus a team of regional leaders. • Parties can run multiple candidates in a district and voters rank their preferred candidates on the ballot (1, 2, 3, etc.). |
DMP was invented in 2013 by a University of Alberta mathematics student named Sean Graham. The system was intended as a possible replacement for FPTP in Canadian national and provincial elections.
|
The New Zealand electoral system has been mixed-member proportional (MMP) since 1996. MMP was introduced after a referendum in 1993. ... The term of the New Zealand Parliament is set at three years. Whichever party (or combination of parties) wins the most seats at the general election becomes the Government.
|
|
Do you think electoral reform is important for our democracy?
Pensez-vous que la réforme électorale est importante pour notre démocratie?
Which system should we use for provincial elections:
First-Past-The-Post or Proportional Representation?
Quel système devrions-nous utiliser pour les élections provinciales:
Uninominal majoritaire à un tour ou Représentation proportionnelle?
Pensez-vous que la réforme électorale est importante pour notre démocratie?
Which system should we use for provincial elections:
First-Past-The-Post or Proportional Representation?
Quel système devrions-nous utiliser pour les élections provinciales:
Uninominal majoritaire à un tour ou Représentation proportionnelle?